Dev Bootcamp: A Few Months for a Job or a Few Years for a Career
Mark Werwath brings us this article on the potential pitfalls of quick and cheap development education compared to the long-term investment of an MEM degree.

Lotus Notes from the 1980s offers a comparable programming fad. Back in the day, programmers who knew Lotus 123 or Lotus Notes had a distinct advantage over those that didn’t, but that didn’t necessarily insure long-term career success. Some people with Lotus Notes training had long employment relationships of five to ten years, but then the demand for Lotus Notes dried up, and the employees who didn’t invest in themselves were stuck. Conversely, those who knew Lotus 123 were in perpetual demand as the software morphed into MS Excel and the skills needed became commonplace and almost mandatory in every corporate and financial setting.
I agree that having practical programming skills is a great thing, but only when combined with long-term educational investments that are more strategic in nature. I myself took training, during my MEM years right here at Northwestern, in the application of Lotus 123. Ruby on Rails training might last for several years as a useful skill, but the career market and technological developments are unpredictable. Schools like Northwestern train people to run serious businesses, commercialize a variety of technologies, and lead teams of people. MEM is about teaching students how to teach themselves in the pursuit of life-long learning. Alumni know how to stay up to date so they can predict market changes before they occur and successfully adapt to unexpected shifts rather than risk getting stuck in one track that might fizzle out in less than a decade. Ruby on Rails training might seem cost-effective at the time, but the difference between an MEM graduate and a Bootcamp graduate five years down the road could be a completely different story.